May God be the witness that you are martyrs ...
You died to honor God's word. (You) committed suicide? We committed suicide by living like the dead---
Ghazi Algosaibi Saudi Arabian Ambassador to London in
"The Martyrs,"

PROFESSORIAL SUMMARY OF OIL POLITICS

A University of Texas professor comments upon oil politics and Saudi Arabia by saying: “For all the talk of a ‘special relationship’ between the United States and Israel, it's clear that for American policy makers there's nothing particularly special about their support for Israel or rejection of Palestinian rights. ... To the degree that U.S. policy makers believe backing Israeli conquest and aggression in Palestine advances U.S. long-term business interests, support for Israel continues. ... The central principle of every U.S. administration since the end of World War II has been that the resources of the region do not truly belong to the people of the region, but instead exist for the benefit of Americans. It is not simply a question of who owns the oil, but who controls the flow of oil and oil profits. ... One component of this policy is support for the oil-rich countries, such as Saudi Arabia. Saudi rulers take their cut of the profits, channeling what remains into investments in the West and the purchase of U.S. weapons. In exchange, Saudi Arabia -- a monarchy that could not exist independently -- gets U.S. protection. ... It is common practice for empires to set up client regimes in a region and then play them off each other, which not surprisingly produces tension, especially when the governments are not representative of their people. That's what U.S. diplomatic and military officials are paid to do -- manage the tensions, always keeping an eye on the ultimate goal. U.S. control -- not peace -- is that goal. ... the U.S. policy makers shape foreign policy to benefit U.S. elite economic interests, not those of another country. ... The more the United States overplays its hand in the Middle East, the more the rest of the world sees clearly U.S. intentions. The question is, can we the American people see the same, and demand of our government a policy geared toward justice not domination.” F255 It could be said the US State Department works for the elite and not for the US taxpayer. How many times have we mentioned the pattern of State Department officials trampling US torture/kidnap victims for the benefit of the Saud family Washington retainers.It is perplexing that this University of Texas professor be allowed to speak in such frank terms about oil politics when his paycheck is contingent upon oil royalties from a Texas foundation and Houston oil interests.

The Washington National Press Club Record reports: “The NPC was astounded by the detention of a reporter (National Review’s Joel Mowbary) by the Diplomatic Security Service ... The apparent intention was to ascertain the source of classified cables relating to embarrassing problems with U.S. visas in Saudi Arabia ... such tactics, if employed regularly would make a mockery of our constitutional guarantees of press freedom.” F256 The Wall Street Journal reports: “National Review writer Joel Mowbray had the temerity at Friday's press briefing to question State spokesman Richard Boucher about ‘Visa Express,’ a program that has made it easier for Saudi Arabian citizens to enter the U.S. without interviews. Mr. Boucher had denied that the U.S. ambassador to Riyadh wanted to terminate Visa Express, even though a classified cable had clearly said otherwise. ... State's instinct is always to attack Americans who raise questions, instead of pressuring the Saudis on behalf of U.S. interests.” F257 The Associate Press reports: “Fifteen of the 19 airplane hijackers responsible for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks received their visas from the U.S. consular office in Saudi Arabia. The State Department has defended the decision to issue those visas, contending that it had no information from U.S. law enforcement agencies on which to reject the applicants. Amid widespread complaints from members of Congress, the State Department has ordered a review of procedures at all 207 U.S. posts worldwide that issue visas.” F258 Neither the State Department not any other law enforcement agency has ever interviewed employees granting visas to 9/11 terrorists about who gave them permission to issue the documents. Congress will only deal with the “fast track Visa Express” given Saudi commoners by the State Department. Congress will not address why non-governmental Saud family princelings neither require visas nor emigration checks upon entering and leaving the US. This subject has been avoided by all Congressional oversight hearings. Perhaps it is because if Congress mentions this Saud family princely “special relationship” perk, it will open to onerous behavior like US child abductions via uncontested Saud family airplanes. How many US children will be kidnaped by the Saud family and their associates before the US establishment media expose this continuing behavior.

US CHILD KIDNAP VICTIMS

These are but a few of the many kidnapped US children with the desired Saud family product female profile. Many of these children end up in Saud family palaces as child sex slaves, never to be heard from again. Unfortunately, Ambassador Prince Bandar carries on the Saud family tradition of lusting after the young. As we have noted in prior issues, US girls and boys are considered high end product and are special ordered by the Saud family. Congressman Dan Burton’s Congressional Hearing into the Saud family US child kidnappings is on record saying Ambassador Prince Bandar’s office is instrumental in US child kidnappings. Washington is well aware of these kidnappings orchestrated by Saud family princelings but are thought to consider it a part of the Saud family “special relationship” perks protected by Ambassador Prince Bandar’s Washington retainers. It is sad to think that each US child abducted by the Saud family has a perpetually grieving mother and father with no government to turn for help.

STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF CHILDREN’S ISSUES!

A reliable source within the State Department has told us that during the 1980s there was a marked increase in the number of unsolved US child abductions. We have mentioned in the past that gangs, modeling agencies, acting agencies etc were recruited to satisfy the ongoing need for special ordering of US child sex slaves, especially for Saud family princes. During the late 1980s the State Department was inundated by requests from state law enforcement officials and parents of kidnapped children. The State Department decided to create the Office of Children’s Issues to obfuscate those requesting assistance. During the early 1990s, the Office of Children’s Issues was created by Washington to mollify state law enforcement by telling them to consider all child abductions local, even though state police had hard evidence of organized international kidnapping organizations. Further, the Office of Children’ Issues was told to lower the expectations of parents of ever finding their children. Associated Press reports: “Thirty-five conservative and family value groups are challenging the appointment of Maura Harty, a veteran foreign service officer, to run the State Department's consular affairs bureau. In letters to the White House, the groups said her appointment would continue the "courtesy culture" of U.S. diplomats not protecting American children who have been taken to Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries. ... ‘Unfortunately, under her leadership, the office had a reputation of capitulating to the demands of foreign states in cases of child abduction,’ the groups said. ‘Now is not the time to continue the status quo,’ they wrote President Bush. ‘We encourage you to take this opportunity to nominate someone with strong and insightful leadership.’ State Department officials defended Harty, meanwhile, as a dedicated officer who expanded the children's office to provide support for parents seeking to be reunited with their children.” F259 The Washington Post reports: “when Harty was in charge of the State Department's Office of Children's Issues, ‘the office had a reputation of capitulating to the demands of foreign states in cases of child abduction. Now is not the time to continue the status quo.’ ... The conservative campaign against Harty's nomination also appears to have a broader target -- what critics consider an insular State Department culture more concerned with maintaining good relations with countries that host U.S. diplomats than with reuniting American families.” F260

STATE DEPARTMENT CHILD SEX SLAVE RECRUITMENT

A State Department reliable source has old us that the State Department exported a procedure by which child sex slaves could be used to blackmail foreign diplomats. Our issue #13 depicts the Sultan of Brunei’s sex slaves used to entertain dignitaries, including US. The State Department allows all Saud family princelings free passage under the “special relationship” rubric in and out of the US. This facilitates, among other amenities, abduction of US children. US child sex slaves are used by the Saud family to entertain foreign diplomats, including Washington dignitaries. There is said to be a library in Riyadh containing pictures of world elite in compromising positions with male and female child sex slaves. The Washington Post reports: “The boys are believed to have been 15 to 17 years old. As shocking as this may be, some say it’s routine. A former Bush economic adviser observes, ‘The Sex? That’s done all the time. If a foreign diplomat wants a companion, the State Department provides it. It doesn’t matter if it’s a man or woman. They have a special fund set up for that.” Another former NSC [National Security Council] official who requested anonymity says other countries also do it. “I was offered every sexual favor you can imagine. I turned it down all the time. After a while they left me alone and stopped offering me.’ ” F261 Herb Mallard says: “I have personally talked to two girls who had been given to Bandar within the US. One had difficulty rebuffing him in the presence of a prior president. It is well known in Washington Bandar requests blond blue eyed girls for sex.” The State Department usually supports the dignitaries at the expense of the US citizens by saying:: “We can neither confirm nor deny these matters.” What should parents do when the State Department recruits their children for sex with the likes of Ambassador Prince Bandar and his associates? Who do the grieving parents go to for criminal justice?

ARABIAN SEX SLAVE TRANSPORT

The Guardian reports: “A growing number of adolescent girls from eastern Europe are being sold into sex slavery ... Those falling victim to people-traffickers are becoming younger ... Turkey is now the staging post for women on their way to the Middle East.” F262 The Saud family facilitate this mode of sex slave trafficking for their commoners since it is cheaper. Since the Saud family are high end buyers on the child sex slave market, their “product” is more expensive and affords more delicate handling. This is why the Saud family child sex slaves are usually brought into Saudi Arabia via private plane.

Uncle Bandar Advising!

“Uncle Bandar” has been an intimate of the Bush family ever since he achieved influence. When a Bush is President, Bandar is given control of the Arab Washington agenda. Of late, Ambassador Prince Bandar has been in deliberation with President George W. Bush in an attempt to close down Congressman Dan Burton’s Congressional investigation into Saud family US child abductions. We believe Bandar and his Washington retainers will again be successful. In their timeworn tradition the State Department says; “we can neither confirm nor deny” that these Saud family child kidnappings are occurring. Each kidnapped child leaves a perpetually grieving family behind without recourse.

SAUD FAMILY “DIPLOMATIC” SMUGGLING

WHO SHORTED PERTINENT STOCKS BEFORE 9/11

The Wall Street Journal reports: “A federal prosecutor said that Amr Elgindy, a short seller charged with conspiring with Federal Bureau of Investigation agents to make money by manipulating his children’s $300,000 fund on Sept. 10 and may have had prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks. ... Assistant U.S. Attorney Ken Breen also cited Mr. Elgindy’s dual Egyptian and U.S. citizenship, his travels to the Middle East and a series of wire transfers from accounts in Canada and the U.S. to Lebanon beginning last October as reasons to suspect the investor had ‘prior knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks’ and was a flight risk. ... Accusations that Mr. Elgindy knew about and profited from the terrorist attacks have for months swirled around stock-market message boards on the Internet.” F264 Common Dreams comments: “In the immediate aftermath of 9/11 a number of news stories appeared concerning investments in “put” options in United and American Airlines. Put options are shares that are bets on falling market prices for specific stocks. In the week before September 11 put options in United and American Airlines went through a furious and unprecedented spasm of investment. In addition put options for Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch, two of the biggest occupants of the World Trade Center, also saw abnormal activity. Most of the investments in these put options originated in Germany through the Deutsche Bank. Deutche Bank had earlier acquired Banker’s Trust, a investment banking firm whose Vice Chairman in charge of ‘private client relations’ in the late 1990’s was A. B. ‘Buzzy’ Krongard. In March of 2001, Krongard was appointed Executive Director of the CIA. Certainly, the CIA has a history of laundering money and dealings with shady investment characters. What becomes particularly relevant in the lead-up to 9/11 is the August CIA briefing of Bush concerning the potential threat of attacks by bin Laden using hijacked planes on certain sites, such as the Pentagon and World Trade Center, and the fact that the CIA had bugging equipment on bin Laden messages and international banking operations. Although no one has apparently claimed the money from the put options, questions remain about Krongard and the CIA’s involvement.” F265 Perhaps the Washington operatives linked to the Deutche Bank short selling were just using their unused knowledge to make a buck. One cannot castigate them since the Saud family Washington retainers have done worse, especially their torture/kidnap lobbyists. We will not know until somebody claims the Deutche Bank money. We see a continuing cloud over the legal action against the Saud family and their government until a resolution to profiteers as well as those forewarned not to go near the World Trade Center 9/11/02 is determined.

Go to Issue #33

Back to Home Page